National Investigators Exam (NIE) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the National Investigators Exam (NIE) by studying with flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Each question comes with hints and explanations to help you succeed. Boost your readiness and confidence for the exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

In which case would a person be guilty of robbery?

Taking an item without owner knowledge
Using force to take an item directly from a victim
Stealing an item and later threatening the victim
Claiming ownership of an abandoned item

The correct answer is: Using force to take an item directly from a victim

A person would be guilty of robbery in the scenario where they are using force to take an item directly from a victim. This is because robbery is defined as the act of taking property from a person through the use of intimidation, threat, or physical force. The key element of robbery is the direct confrontation and the element of coercion or violence involved in the act of taking the property. In this instance, the application of force directly impacts the victim, making it a criminal offense that is treated more severely than simple theft. The physical aspect of taking the item, coupled with the presence of the victim, distinguishes robbery from other forms of theft, which may not necessarily involve a direct encounter or immediate threat to a person.